For our group documentary project,
Pablo, Sydney, Monica, Theresa and I intended to make a documentary that defines
our own interpretations of feminism. In completing this documentary, we had to
confront and ask ourselves not only ‘why are we feminists?’ but how our
identification as a feminist intersects with our race, sexuality, gender,
religion, and academic achievement. In looking
at each of our unique answers and personal stories, we highlight differences in
interpretation through our conversations with one another. The documentary ultimately brings to light
that there is no one definition of feminism. Instead feminism is a complex and
dynamic concept, which changes with our own experiences. Our intent in creating this project is to ultimately
create a truthful depiction of what we consider reflections on the
intersections of feminism.
To make this
project, we interviewed ourselves and two other individuals who are not part of
our class. By interviewing each other,
this project gave us the unique opportunity to be insiders on a piece of
work. Because a majority of the content
was provided through personal anecdotes and conversations that we had with each
other, this project became a self-reflexive discovery of how our own
backgrounds influenced our decision to be feminists. In this way the
documentary is not only a reflection on feminism as topic, but also the
relationship we as filmmakers have as our positionalities reflect the notion
that the type of feminist action we participate in is influenced by our
personal backgrounds and struggles.
To bring outside
voices to our project, we also interviewed two other individuals, Monica and
Theresa’s stepdad who did not consider himself a feminist and a feminist professor
at CGU who teaches economics. We
specifically chose these interviews to provide counter arguments and to provide
a depth to our trajectory, as we saw how intersections of feminism are not
unique to ourselves, but is something that appears across diverse backgrounds.
When we
started this project, we each had personal opinions on how we should regard
feminism. Some of the questions we
bounced back and forth included looking at depictions of feminism in
nontraditional fields, seeing why/why not some people consider themselves
feminists, how feminism relates to one’s personal background and how one
conducts feminist activism? I
appreciated that our documentary stayed away from typical and stereotypical
depictions of feminism such as over-sexuality, but instead focused on the
internal struggles people experience and made these thoughts visible through a
visual medium.
Fortunately,
even as a group of 5, we collaborated extremely well together. We each played a role in interviewing people,
interviewing each other, finding clips on YouTube (which we ultimately cut
out), editing, and conceptualizing ideas. Over the past couple of weeks we have
regarded the documentary different from ethnography in part because of its
classification as an art form. Pablo
found a quote by Gloria Anzaldua that broke everything we had brainstormed:
ideas regarding identity, inner struggles, societal connections, awareness of feminism,
activism and protests, into one larger context. As a group, we analyzed this quote
and framed our interview questions around the message portrayed through
Anzaldua’s words. Inspired by the WE CARE documentary, we chose to read the
Anzaldua quote out loud as a group at the end of the film. The reading of the quote out loud synched
with a montage of images that represented our identification with feminism
symbolizes that the issues that the quote references affect us all, yet in
differing ways. Through using the camera
to examine the Anzaldua quote and our self-reflexive interviews, we aimed to
focus specifically on how our relationship to feminism derives from individual
yet mutual experiences.
No comments:
Post a Comment